|Subject:||Re: Reliable after-change-functions (via: Using incremental parsing in Emacs)|
|Date:||Mon, 30 Mar 2020 13:14:02 -0400|
Do you mean it’s a bug in eglot/lsp-mode or it’s a bug in inhibit-modification-hooks (or the code who set it to t)?
Why not simply pass to tree-sitter the chunk that jit-lock is about to
Incremental parsing seems to be the preferred way to use tree-sitter—maintaining a syntax tree on the fly and later query for information from it.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|