[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ? |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Apr 2020 11:53:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 09:45:44AM +0000, ndame wrote:
> On Sunday, April 26, 2020 6:09 AM, Po Lu <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Zach Pearson zach@zjp.codes writes:
> >
> > > Some people use the buttons in reverse order or otherwise don’t have mice
> > > that conform to the standard that wording would expect. I don’t think it
> > > takes too much cognitive
> > > overhead to map 1/2/3 to left/right/middle for users of those kinds of
> > > mice.
> >
> > Actually, 1/2/3 is left/middle/right
>
>
> This exchange also raises the question: is there an advantage
> of naming mouse buttons with numbers, instead of using the established
> terminology what pretty much all maintream tools use?
What is the "established terminology"?
Cheers
-- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?, Po Lu, 2020/04/26