[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ? |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Apr 2020 16:50:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:26:41AM -0400, Clément Pit-Claudel wrote:
> On 27/04/2020 10.08, address@hidden wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 09:36:41AM -0400, Clément Pit-Claudel wrote:
> >> On 27/04/2020 07.31, address@hidden wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >>> If you want Emacs to adapt in this point, it's on you to convince
> >>> Emacs people that this change is important.
> >>
> >> FWIW, I don't find the comparison to speaking German very convincing
> >> either.
> >
> > All metaphors suck in some way. My point is... I've seen all
> > too often this antipattern [...]
> Sometimes it takes an outsider to point out that the emperor has no clothes.
[...]
I think we're going in circles. For me, we passed the point of
diminishing returns, so I'll stop here.
Cheers
-- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?, (continued)
Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?, ndame, 2020/04/27
Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?, ndame, 2020/04/27
RE: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?, Drew Adams, 2020/04/27
Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?, chad, 2020/04/27
Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?, Richard Stallman, 2020/04/27
Re: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?, Tim Cross, 2020/04/27
RE: Why mouse-1/2/3 ?, Drew Adams, 2020/04/27