[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ELPA] New package: transient

From: tomas
Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: transient
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 20:41:23 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 08:30:43PM +0300, Dmitry Gutov wrote:
> On 30.04.2020 15:38, address@hidden wrote:
> >And when people react ("hell, no!"), you're offended and drive deeper
> >in your denial of the "other side's" points.
> When offended people overreact and make up strawmen, that's when the
> discussion is derailed.
> It's very hard to move forward (at all) if nobody creates proposals
> on "how we should be doing things better", or if they are actively
> shunned. And it's on us, as a community, to be able to discuss them
> constructively, on the merits.

It's "on us" as it is "on everyone", I think :-)

> FWIW, my position is we don't need to change everything, especially
> not the low-level functions (car and aref are fine; seq.el and
> map.el provide good generic replacements), but the problem is real.
> And "you can use the index in the manual" is not a good replacement
> for consistent naming conventions.

I think there is general agreement on that around here.

-- tomás

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]