[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion
From: |
Philippe Vaucher |
Subject: |
Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion |
Date: |
Mon, 4 May 2020 18:32:58 +0200 |
> > Having multiple names for the same thing also reduces discoverability,
>
> Even worse yet, as has been mentioned (but is often forgotten), it
> makes code readability harder.
I think it depends on the reader. I know that for me it'd greatly
improve discoverability and make code readability easier. But I
understand that it also creates noise when listing functions or
reading code for those who'd not use them, thus having the opposite
effect.
- Namespaces - summary, conclusion, Philippe Vaucher, 2020/05/04
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, Philippe Vaucher, 2020/05/04
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, Stefan Kangas, 2020/05/04
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, Philippe Vaucher, 2020/05/04
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/05/04
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, Stefan Kangas, 2020/05/04
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, Joost Kremers, 2020/05/04
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/05/04
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, tomas, 2020/05/04
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion,
Philippe Vaucher <=
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/04
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, Philippe Vaucher, 2020/05/04
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/05/04
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/05/04
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/05/05
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/05/04
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, Stefan Monnier, 2020/05/04
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, 조성빈, 2020/05/04
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, Philippe Vaucher, 2020/05/04
- Re: Namespaces - summary, conclusion, 조성빈, 2020/05/05