On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 10:13 PM Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden
On 05.05.2020 23:42, João Távora wrote:
> Sure, I think so. If they were here today, you could have
> the s.el library under the "modern-string" namespace
> or "magnar-string" namespace or something like that. I don't
> see it'd be contentious.
What about the "string" namespace?
It's only a namespace if/when we decide it. Maybe never.
Until then, its the beginning of a symbol name in the main
nameless space (which is what it has always been -- we
just squint really hard to pretend it's not).