[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PL support

From: Stefan Monnier
Subject: Re: PL support
Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 13:41:38 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux)

>> - It would not impose our own coding conventions and would hence happily
>>    accept `s.el`.
> Note: we most likely can ask s.el's author to better follow _some_ of our
> conventions, if that's what it takes to accept it for GNU ELPA.
> But renaming the package (with 400+ dependencies out there) would
>  be impractical.

The issue is not `s.el`, but any other package with comparable (tho not
necessarily identical) issues w.r.t coding convention.  I mention `s.el`
as an example of a package where the breakage of coding-convention seems
severe enough (contrary to my own judgment, FWIW) to disallow it into
GNU ELPA even though everyone agrees it is technically fine.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]