Re: dash.el [was: Re: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs]

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 17.05.2020 16:01, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > Most people (somewhat wrongly) think of GNU ELPA as a*distribution*
> >    > site for third party packages, like MELPA.
> >
> > Maybe that changes things.  If we present ELPA as just a distribution
> > site.
> If we regard ELPA just as distribution site, we shouldn't decide so lightly to 
> leave important packages on ELPA, we should be tend more to adding them to core.

I would like to point out, as an author of several packages, that in my 
experience having a package in ELPA is _better_ than having it in the core.

The exception to that rule is more or less cases where the package is 
not only added but also enabled by default.