Re: Removing no-back-reference restriction from syntax-propertize-rules

[Stefan Monnier]

>> Looks good.  IRC you had some tests to along with it.
>> If you could install them at the same time, that would be great.
> Of course.  I guess it is ok to only test the shifting function?

Yes.

> Or something more elaborate that puts text in a temp buffer, makes
> a syntax-propertize-function with syntax-propertize-rules and checks
> if the 'syntax-table properties get applied as expected?

Any test is better than no test at this point, so ... take your pick.


        Stefan