[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: My perspective as a mid-level user on pros/cons of different editors
From: |
ndame |
Subject: |
Re: My perspective as a mid-level user on pros/cons of different editors |
Date: |
Thu, 21 May 2020 09:55:18 +0000 |
> As a user, I really want to be able to jump to
> eclaration/implementation/find references/get completion to work etc. I
> ouldn't care as slightest how it is implemented as long as it worked
> ell. Unfortunately (or fortunately) I know all the minutiae details on
> ow it works in my copy of Emacs since I had to install each and every
> acakge and configure them all together to get that working for me.
> hich indeed took quite some time untill I learned what I need, how to
> onfigure it and finally how to use it.
As you did it already how hard would it be you think to create a package which does this automatically?
I'm wondering why somebody hasn't made this already.
I don't mean a package in ELPA, but rather in MELPA, so the package is not restricted from downloading and installing a server, etc it could do anything what is needed to set up the configuration. Why aren't there packages for various languages which set up the completion/go to definition stuff automatically? Is there a technical problem?
- Re: My perspective as a mid-level user on pros/cons of different editors, (continued)
Re: My perspective as a mid-level user on pros/cons of different editors, Stefan Monnier, 2020/05/20
Re: My perspective as a mid-level user on pros/cons of different editors, ndame, 2020/05/20
Re: My perspective as a mid-level user on pros/cons of different editors,
ndame <=