[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks? A: Auto
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks? A: Autocompletion |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Jun 2020 13:49:53 -0700 (PDT) |
To be more clear:
My purpose in mentioning what Icicles does wrt
incremental completion ("autocompletion") was
to suggest features that can be useful in this
context - food for thought - not to solicit
use of Icicles.
IOW, vanilla Emacs might also consider such
features, or similar. And none of what I
described requires the use of the minibuffer,
even if that's what Icicles uses.
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks? A: Autocompletion, (continued)
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks? A: Autocompletion, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/06/03
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks? A: Autocompletion, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2020/06/03
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks? A: Autocompletion, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/06/03
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks? A: Autocompletion, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2020/06/03
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks? A: Autocompletion, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/06/03
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks? A: Autocompletion, Konstantin Kharlamov, 2020/06/03
- Re: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks? A: Autocompletion, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/06/03
RE: What is the most useful potential feature which Emacs lacks? A: Autocompletion, Drew Adams, 2020/06/03