[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Okay to commit purely cosmetic (indendation) fixes?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Okay to commit purely cosmetic (indendation) fixes? |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Aug 2020 08:23:49 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> Lars Ingebrigtsen: I don't understand why you wouldn't bundle
>> whitespace changes, rather than one at a time, as long as they were to
>> correct deviations from a coding standard.
> Whitespace changes make following code changes more difficult when
> digging into the history.
They're also a source of painful spurious conflicts for people
managing branches. So we prefer that whitespace changes are only
installed along with real changes that touch that same code, although we
definitely tolerate a few extra whitespace touch ups here and there.
Stefan
- Okay to commit purely cosmetic (indendation) fixes?, Karl Fogel, 2020/08/09
- Re: Okay to commit purely cosmetic (indendation) fixes?, Clive Tovero, 2020/08/09
- Re: Okay to commit purely cosmetic (indendation) fixes?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/08/10
- Re: Okay to commit purely cosmetic (indendation) fixes?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/08/10
- Re: Okay to commit purely cosmetic (indendation) fixes?, Clive Tovero, 2020/08/10
- Re: Okay to commit purely cosmetic (indendation) fixes?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/08/10
- Re: Okay to commit purely cosmetic (indendation) fixes?, Clive Tovero, 2020/08/10
Re: Okay to commit purely cosmetic (indendation) fixes?, Clive Tovero, 2020/08/10