|Subject:||Re: Changes for emacs 28|
|Date:||Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:04:47 +0000|
|User-agent:||Alpine 2.22 (NEB 394 2020-01-19)|
Yes, that matches the Mailman documentation. Iʼm not sure what a good solution is; Mailman adding a Reply-To with both the sender and emacs-devel would no doubt also break either Outlook or rmail or both. Not adding a Reply-To at all means the sender would get dropped <sigh>.
In fact not adding a Reply-To would be perfect, at least for me. Presumably someone who sends a message to a list has subscribed to the list, of if they are not, it's common to mention explicitly that they are not.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|