[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A modern-mode?

From: tomas
Subject: Re: A modern-mode?
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:42:51 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 02:40:53PM +0200, Arthur Miller wrote:
> João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:
> >                          I just meant the "custom-themes" 
> > infrastructure should be enough to accommodate enough of 
> > the proposed "modern-mode".  Not sure if it is (as I don't use it).
> No, it is not. It lacks unified framework to use as logicla names for
> color use;

Isn't "face" the better abstraction, anyway? Think blind people.
Think color-blind people (up to 8% of the male and 0.5% of the
female population of Norther European descent [1]).

Conveying semantics via color has to have some fallback, and
this meshes well with faces, I think.


[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_blindness

 - t

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]