On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 02:40:53PM +0200, Arthur Miller wrote:
> João Távora <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > I just meant the "custom-themes"
> > infrastructure should be enough to accommodate enough of
> > the proposed "modern-mode". Not sure if it is (as I don't use it).
> No, it is not. It lacks unified framework to use as logicla names for
> color use;
Isn't "face" the better abstraction, anyway? Think blind people.
Think color-blind people (up to 8% of the male and 0.5% of the
female population of Norther European descent ).
Conveying semantics via color has to have some fallback, and
this meshes well with faces, I think.