RE: master 583cb26 2/3: Improve accuracy in string-replace description (bug#43598)

[Drew Adams]

> > > So they are not equal, right?
> >
> > Right.  I don't think anyone said they were.
> 
> You suggested to use "equal" in the doc string
> for strings which we now agree are not equal.
> Such doc string would confusing.

We're going 'round and 'round.

As I said before, I am not the one who suggested
to use "equal":

   I'm not the one who proposed that "equal" part

And the suggestions were _never_ to say that the
input and result strings are equal.  It was to
say that the input string _with the changes
applied_ is equal (in fact `equal') to the
returned string.  Which is true.

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2020-09/msg02159.html

I suggest you maybe reread what the suggestions were.

This incessant back & forth quibbling is tiring.
I'm done with this one.