Re: Request: Specification For Denoting Keys

[Stefan Monnier]

> It gives examples, but it's unclear that it covers all notations that
> have been used in the wild over the years --- as in "everything in the
> info node is handled by (kbd ...)" but not everything handled by (kbd
> ...) is in the info node. I'm not saying that the latter should
> happen, I'm looking at what a new parallel ( (call it keyname)
> function should be prepared to consume.

I'm not sure I understand what you're getting at, but `kbd` should
(hopefully) be the reverse of `key-description`.  IIRC there are a few
discrepancies between the two functions, but they should be considered
as bugs rather than as features.


        Stefan