[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NonGNU ELPA
From: |
Antoine Kalmbach |
Subject: |
Re: NonGNU ELPA |
Date: |
Sat, 24 Oct 2020 17:40:43 +0300 |
Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support> writes:
> And Gitlab or Gitea is convenient, and if such exists already it is
> good. But that one responds on gnu.org domain, so people could mistake
> it for being GNU software, which those packages are not yet.
Ah, I only propose using the emba.gnu.org instance for CI tests, not
for hosting packages. The CI runs are just something that runs to verify
each update to (non)gnu elpa does not introduce broken pacakges. But this
Gitlab instance, due to the reason you state, is not suitable for
hosting non-GNU packages.
--
Antoine Kalmbach
- Re: NonGNU ELPA and release frequency, (continued)
- Re: NonGNU ELPA and release frequency, Jean Louis, 2020/10/24
- Re: NonGNU ELPA and release frequency, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/24
- Re: NonGNU ELPA and release frequency, Jean Louis, 2020/10/24
- Re: NonGNU ELPA and release frequency, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/24
- Re: NonGNU ELPA and release frequency, Jean Louis, 2020/10/24
- Re: NonGNU ELPA and release frequency, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/24
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Jean Louis, 2020/10/24
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/10/24
- Re: NonGNU ELPA and release frequency, Antoine Kalmbach, 2020/10/24
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Jean Louis, 2020/10/24
- Re: NonGNU ELPA,
Antoine Kalmbach <=
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Michael Albinus, 2020/10/24
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Stefan Kangas, 2020/10/24
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Antoine Kalmbach, 2020/10/24
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Michael Albinus, 2020/10/24
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Michael Albinus, 2020/10/25
- Re: NonGNU ELPA, Antoine Kalmbach, 2020/10/25
- Re: NonGNU ELPA and release frequency, Richard Stallman, 2020/10/24
- Re: NonGNU ELPA and release frequency, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/10/25
- Re: NonGNU ELPA and release frequency, Stefan Monnier, 2020/10/25
- Re: NonGNU ELPA and release frequency, Ivan Yonchovski, 2020/10/25