[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal for an Emacs User Survey
From: |
Jean Louis |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal for an Emacs User Survey |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Oct 2020 23:21:38 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/+ (1036f0e) (2020-10-18) |
* Ivan Yonchovski <yyoncho@gmail.com> [2020-10-26 21:14]:
>
> Jean Louis writes:
>
> > Both ways how the surve have been presented with the proprietary
> > Javascript and with the download of the Org file, are not user
> > friendly and cannot reach large sample. One also needs marketing
> > skills.
>
> What number of responders will be considered large enough sample?
That is not easy to determine. I would say that 1000 people would be
minimum in each case and it would never be enough, as that comes from
personal experience from work in two organizations, one was
specifically a survey company and other was conducting always surveys
for its own humanitarian purposes.
From:
https://www.cloudresearch.com/resources/guides/statistical-significance/determine-sample-size/
As you can see, even when a population is large, researchers can often
understand the entire group with about 1,000 respondents.
Population Size Sample Size Based on ±3% Sample Size Based on ±5% Sample
Size Based on ±10%
Margin of Error Margin of Error Margin of Error
500 345 220 80
1,000 525 285 90
3,000 810 350 100
5,000 910 370 100
10,000 1,000 385 100
100,00+ 1,100 400 100
----- end of quote --------
Every survey should have its purpose, usually to improve the product
or service, in this case Emacs. Improvements are constantly made and
public opinion is looked upon.
To discuss issues with people is human, friendly and vibrant activity
and is way of taking opinions (bug reports, emails, opinions, package
contributions) and putting them in reality (patches, improvements,
ELPA...).
To ask people questions online without opportunity for feedback is
one-way, dead end type of a communication.
There are few questions that look like there is question about
accessibility yet we will see later what comes out of it. If website
is not made well accessible those questions may not be productive.
For solving usability issues, instead of 1000 people one could as well
follow feedback from 5 users, reference:
https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/
Article refers to web, it may be applied on Emacs user interface.
Quote:
Usability is a quality attribute that assesses how easy user
interfaces are to use. The word "usability" also refers to methods for
improving ease-of-use during the design process.
Usability is defined by 5 quality components:
- Learnability: How easy is it for users to accomplish basic tasks the
first time they encounter the design?
- Efficiency: Once users have learned the design, how quickly can they
perform tasks?
- Memorability: When users return to the design after a period of not
using it, how easily can they reestablish proficiency?
- Errors: How many errors do users make, how severe are these errors,
and how easily can they recover from the errors?
- Satisfaction: How pleasant is it to use the design?
--
Jean Louis
- Re: Proposal for an Emacs User Survey, (continued)
- Re: Proposal for an Emacs User Survey, Richard Stallman, 2020/10/20
- Re: Proposal for an Emacs User Survey, Thibaut Verron, 2020/10/20
- Re: Proposal for an Emacs User Survey, Jean Louis, 2020/10/20
- Re: Proposal for an Emacs User Survey, Thibaut Verron, 2020/10/20
- Re: Proposal for an Emacs User Survey, Jean Louis, 2020/10/26
- Re: Proposal for an Emacs User Survey, Teemu Likonen, 2020/10/26
- Re: Proposal for an Emacs User Survey, Jean Louis, 2020/10/26
- Re: Proposal for an Emacs User Survey, Richard Stallman, 2020/10/26
- Re: Proposal for an Emacs User Survey, Jean Louis, 2020/10/27
- Re: Proposal for an Emacs User Survey, Ivan Yonchovski, 2020/10/26
- Re: Proposal for an Emacs User Survey,
Jean Louis <=