[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Support "\n" in icomplete-separator
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Support "\n" in icomplete-separator |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Nov 2020 22:21:23 +0200 |
> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 18:39:41 +0000
> From: Gregory Heytings <ghe@sdf.org>
> cc: rudalics@gmx.at, spacibba@aol.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca,
> andreyk.mad@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> I honestly don't understand why you consider that vertical icomplete is
> "not pretty", even more so as you seem to consider at the same time that
> Emacs' handling of emails and web pages is okay. IMO, Emacs' rendering of
> HTML in emails and on web pages is definitely not pretty. IMO again,
> displaying completion candidates in the minibuffer is pretty enough, at
> least I don't see why it would be fundamentally less pretty for a newcomer
> than, say, the completion candidates displayed by Chromium or Visual
> Studio.
If someone wants to claim that display of completion candidates by
icomplete-vertical, ivy, etc. is anywhere near as pretty as what you
get when you click on the address bar of a browser and get the
drop-down list of candidates, then I can only say that I cannot
disagree more.
> > If you read the code that is involved, the reasons are acutely evident,
> > and it is important for me to make these conclusions public and known to
> > all, because many people believe there's no limit to what one can do
> > with Emacs display features. Well, there is.
>
> There are limits, of course, but the feature that is requested is well
> within the limits of what Emacs can do. And AFAIU implementing a proper
> vertical icomplete/ido with a few more features similar to those of Ivy is
> also within the limits of what Emacs can do.
I explicitly said that Emacs _can_ do that. My point was entirely
different.
- Re: [PATCH] Support "\n" in icomplete-separator, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] Support "\n" in icomplete-separator, Jean Louis, 2020/11/11
- Re: [PATCH] Support "\n" in icomplete-separator, Jean Louis, 2020/11/11
- Re: [PATCH] Support "\n" in icomplete-separator, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/11/11
- Re: [PATCH] Support "\n" in icomplete-separator, Gregory Heytings, 2020/11/11
- Re: [PATCH] Support "\n" in icomplete-separator, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/11/11
- Re: [PATCH] Support "\n" in icomplete-separator, Gregory Heytings, 2020/11/11
- Re: [PATCH] Support "\n" in icomplete-separator, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/11/11
- Re: [PATCH] Support "\n" in icomplete-separator, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/11/11
- Re: [PATCH] Support "\n" in icomplete-separator, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/11/11
- Re: [PATCH] Support "\n" in icomplete-separator, Gregory Heytings, 2020/11/11
- Re: [PATCH] Support "\n" in icomplete-separator,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [PATCH] Support "\n" in icomplete-separator, Gregory Heytings, 2020/11/11
- Re: [PATCH] Support "\n" in icomplete-separator, Ergus, 2020/11/11
- Re: [PATCH] Support "\n" in icomplete-separator, Stefan Monnier, 2020/11/11
- Re: [PATCH] Support "\n" in icomplete-separator, Jean Louis, 2020/11/12
- Re: [PATCH] Support "\n" in icomplete-separator, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/11/11
- Re: [PATCH] Support "\n" in icomplete-separator, Gregory Heytings, 2020/11/12
- on helm substantial differences - Re: [PATCH] Support "\n" in icomplete-separator, Jean Louis, 2020/11/12
- Re: on helm substantial differences - Re: [PATCH] Support "\n" in icomplete-separator, Gregory Heytings, 2020/11/12
- Re: on helm substantial differences - Re: [PATCH] Support "\n" in icomplete-separator, Jean Louis, 2020/11/12
- Re: on helm substantial differences - Re: [PATCH] Support "\n" in icomplete-separator, Gregory Heytings, 2020/11/12