Re: thunk.el: Document that thunk-force == funcall?

[Tomas Hlavaty]

On Wed 18 Nov 2020 at 17:49, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
> *scratch* is actually similar to `ielm`, tho without the prompt and using
> "newline" instead of "return" ;-)

interesting

i haven't used ielm so far

>> I don't know how else should have i indicated, that all the code
>> bellow needs lexical binding.  Is there a way to do that without
>> confusing anybody, so that it does not look like it doesn't do what
>> the author thinks it does?
>
> There's no really satisfactory way to do it, but I use
>
>     ;; -*- lexical-binding:t -*-

hmm, my key bindings (like C-M-x eval-defun) don't work on that.  i
would have to use files even for small examples

i will think about adopting that a bit more