[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] hack-one-local-variable use lexical-binding
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] hack-one-local-variable use lexical-binding |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Nov 2020 09:16:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
K-9 Mail for Android |
On November 26, 2020 6:47:44 AM GMT+02:00, Tom Gillespie <tgbugs@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > I think we should just always pass `t` to `eval` there, yes.
> > The other option is over-engineered.
>
> Agreed. Here is the updated patch. I'm guessing this will need a NEWS
> item?
This would be a backward-incompatible change, wouldn't it? I'd prefer a
backward compatible solution. For example, how about a separate lexical-eval
clause, which will do this leaving eval to work as it did before?
And yeas a NEWS item is necessary regardless.
Thanks.
- [PATCH] hack-one-local-variable use lexical-binding, Tom Gillespie, 2020/11/25
- Re: [PATCH] hack-one-local-variable use lexical-binding, Stefan Monnier, 2020/11/25
- Re: [PATCH] hack-one-local-variable use lexical-binding, Tom Gillespie, 2020/11/25
- Re: [PATCH] hack-one-local-variable use lexical-binding,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [PATCH] hack-one-local-variable use lexical-binding, Stefan Monnier, 2020/11/26
- Re: [PATCH] hack-one-local-variable use lexical-binding, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/11/26
- Re: [PATCH] hack-one-local-variable use lexical-binding, Tom Gillespie, 2020/11/28
- Re: [PATCH] hack-one-local-variable use lexical-binding, Stefan Kangas, 2020/11/29
- Re: [PATCH] hack-one-local-variable use lexical-binding, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/11/29
- Re: [PATCH] hack-one-local-variable use lexical-binding, Tom Gillespie, 2020/11/29
- Re: [PATCH] hack-one-local-variable use lexical-binding, Stefan Monnier, 2020/11/29