Re: non-gnu elpa issue tracking

[Eli Zaretskii]

On December 10, 2020 7:03:35 AM GMT+02:00, Boruch Baum <boruch_baum@gmx.com> 
wrote:
> On 2020-12-09 23:35, Richard Stallman wrote:
> >   > 2) The acceptance or candidacy process for each package should
> be
> >   >    documented in some discrete method.
> >
> > Whether to have a certain package in NonGNU ELPA could be a touchy
> > question, in some borderline cases.  Stating the reasons could
> perhaps
> > hurt feelings, or lead to arguments.  So it is best not to do that.
> > We will add a package or we won't.
> 
> This speaks to emacs/GNU/FSF "corporate culture" and really has much
> wider consequences than for non-GNU ELPA, so I'll fork my comment in
> response into a new thread.

That's fine, but let's please not have that thresd here, as discussing this 
stuff is a tangent to this list's scope.

TIA