[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: elpa.git and `new-master`
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: elpa.git and `new-master` |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Dec 2020 18:23:08 +0200 |
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 14:53:47 +0100
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> Gregory Heytings <ghe@sdf.org> writes:
>
> > Could we not adopt "trunk" again, instead of "master" or "main"?
>
> "trunk" would definitely be my preference, but it seems like the git
> world is settling on "main"
There can be no meaningful "trunk" in Git, since it doesn't really
support the "mainline" notion, that's why it isn't used too much in
the Git world. We gave up on trying to maintain a mainline in our Git
repository long ago.
(Of course, that doesn't prevent us from calling a branch "trunk" --
or anything else, really.)
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, (continued)
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Gregory Heytings, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Gregory Heytings, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Pankaj Jangid, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Jean Louis, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Stefan Monnier, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Boruch Baum, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Stefan Monnier, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Boruch Baum, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Stefan Monnier, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Andreas Schwab, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Stefan Monnier, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Andreas Schwab, 2020/12/16