[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: elpa.git and `new-master`
From: |
Boruch Baum |
Subject: |
Re: elpa.git and `new-master` |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Dec 2020 16:24:59 -0500 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20180716 |
On 2020-12-16 22:41, Juri Linkov wrote:
> > I don't have a strong opinion on the specific color of this bikeshed
> > ("master" is convenient because it's less work to implement, "trunk" is
> > what I got used to back in Bzr days and what I thus keep using locally,
> > but "main" is more meaningful (and "virtue signaling")).
> >
> > My original plan was to rename `new-master` to `master`, but I'd be
> > happy to rename it to `main` instead.
>
> For the sake of completion, either `master` or `main` is fine, but
> please don't add both branches with the same prefix. For example,
> I use completion on branch names all the time, and it's very convenient
> to quickly type just `o TAB m TAB` or `o/m TAB` to complete the
> `origin/master` branch. Having two branches with the same prefix `ma-`
> would be a hassle.
Good point. How about using an underscore to prefix the
obsolesced branch? I don't want to suggest a dash prefix because that
can always down the line confuse shell scripts.
Example: _main-obsolete-YYYY-MM-DD
--
hkp://keys.gnupg.net
CA45 09B5 5351 7C11 A9D1 7286 0036 9E45 1595 8BC0
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, (continued)
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Stefan Monnier, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Stefan Monnier, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Stefan Monnier, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`, Juri Linkov, 2020/12/16
- Re: elpa.git and `new-master`,
Boruch Baum <=