|
From: | arthur miller |
Subject: | RE: Docs for &optional and &rest arguments together |
Date: | Thu, 31 Dec 2020 20:01:41 +0000 |
It is New Year Eve Drew. The best lady of all best ladies deserves attention, and I certainly have no need to read references to CL standards and historical mailings etc.
Whatever CL does, who cares, they can do what they want and document what they want. I am pointing at a piece of Elisp documentation which can be better.
But it's not lack of attention, if you actually reflect over what I said, instead of who said it, maybe you will see it too.
Happy New Year, I wish you all best in next year!
-------- Originalmeddelande --------
Från: Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com>
Datum: 2020-12-31 19:19 (GMT+01:00)
Till: arthur miller <arthur.miller@live.com>, tomas@tuxteam.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Ämne: RE: Docs for &optional and &rest arguments together
> I have glanced through though, maybe I am missing it.
Don't just glance. Give it the attention that it and your understanding both deserve. If that CL doc didn't help you then I really suggest you sit down, take it slowly, and reread carefully.
Both the Elisp doc and the CL doc about this are clear and complete, I think. I suggest with respect that you're maybe just not paying enough attention.
Don't be in a hurry. The info is there; just give it a chance - and another read.
The CL link is not documentation, it is an essay, entire novel :-). But interestingly, that do not touch on that case either . I have glanced through though, maybe I am missing it.
> > I don't read it says both c and d are required |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |