[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: named-let
From: |
tomas |
Subject: |
Re: named-let |
Date: |
Sat, 9 Jan 2021 09:58:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 08:43:13PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> The recent discussion around loops motivated me to look a bit further
> into named-let. It's actually easy to define:
:-)
I'm always impressed by the tricks the Lisps can do, at
the hands of experts.
And thanks, Stefan, for explaining things in a way I
can (think I) understand them :-)
(Back on topic: I grew some affection for the named let
from the Scheme/Guile side, so thanks for that, too)
Cheers
- t
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature