[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.

From: Jean Louis
Subject: Org schemas we talked to be non-free, was: [ELPA] New package: repology.el
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 13:53:36 +0300
User-agent: Mutt/2.0 (3d08634) (2020-11-07)

* Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> [2021-01-24 09:36]:
> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>   > > What role do these particular schemas play in the standard?
>   > > Are they examples?  Are they used by the standards documents?
>   > It's not entirely clear to me if they're considered part of the
>   > standard.
> It sounds like they are either examples or part of the standard
> and we cannot tell which.  Is that right?

Schemas are attached.

I see copyright notices inside and it appears to be fully free
document modifiable and distributable as long as copyrights remains.


Attachment: od-manifest-schema-v1.2-os.rnc
Description: Text document

Attachment: od-schema-v1.2-os.rnc
Description: Text document

Attachment: schemas.xml
Description: XML document

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]