[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the
From: |
Stephen Leake |
Subject: |
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:15:10 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (windows-nt) |
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
>> Cc: stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, phillip.lord@russet.org.uk,
>> emacs-devel@gnu.org
>> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 12:57:17 -0500
>>
>> > So when the upstream repository in elpa.git gets new commits, that
>> > someone will have to do that again?
>>
>> Yes, we'll need to sync them every once in a while.
>
> Then I think this is only workable if such updates are done
> automatically by some cron job.
One way to avoid the need for syncing the emacs release branches is to
keep _all_ branches of bundled packages in emacs.git; when a package
becomes bundled, it moves from elpa.git to emacs.git.
I think the current elpa 'make package/[PKNAME]' could handle that?
--
-- Stephe
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, (continued)
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/25
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball,
Stephen Leake <=
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/27
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/01/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/01/27
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/27
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/26
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stephen Leake, 2021/01/27
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stefan Monnier, 2021/01/27
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Re: policy discussion on bundling ELPA packages in the emacs tarball, Stephen Leake, 2021/01/27