[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Concern about new binding.
|
From: |
Sean Whitton |
|
Subject: |
Re: Concern about new binding. |
|
Date: |
Wed, 03 Feb 2021 12:22:03 -0700 |
Hello,
> I see another disadvantage in that binding: revert-buffer is a drastic
> operation, so we should not make it easier. I think it is wiser
> not to put it on a key -- which is why I never did.
You can easily undo it, however, with a quick C-/.
--
Sean Whitton
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., (continued)
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/03
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/03
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Juri Linkov, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Basil L. Contovounesios, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Richard Stallman, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Robert Pluim, 2021/02/04
- RE: [External] : Re: Concern about new binding., Drew Adams, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Stefan Kangas, 2021/02/03
- Re: Concern about new binding., Richard Stallman, 2021/02/04
Re: Concern about new binding.,
Sean Whitton <=
- Re: Concern about new binding., Richard Stallman, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/04
- Re: Concern about new binding., Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/04
Re: Concern about new binding., Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/04