Re: Concern about new binding.

[Gregory Heytings]

> > > Or...  if it could offer to to keep the undo info, even if it's over 
> > > the current general limit, that would be even nicer, perhaps?
> >
> > I don't have strong feelings about this.  Perhaps offering to keep the 
> > undo info after the command has been executed would be nicer indeed. 
> > But not executing the command before a confirmation is perhaps less 
> > risky.
>
> I was thinking about asking before doing anything, if that's practically 
> possible, but I haven't looked at the code.

I misunderstood what you said indeed.  I think asking before doing 
anything would be okay, but I guess in that case it would be necessary to 
introduce an "undo-outer-outer-limit" at, say, 250 MB, above which it 
would not be possible to keep the undo info.