Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
> Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com,  emacs-devel@gnu.org,  dgutov@yandex.ru
> Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 17:31:31 +0100
> 
> > To me, the proposed alternatives sound like a clear win, since the
> > downsides are non-existent, whereas the advantage is clear.  Why do we
> > need to insist on introducing bytecode incompatibility?
> 
> Nobody responded to my dismissals, so I have no idea what parts (if any)
> of those people thought were insufficient.

I thought they did, but maybe I've mixed up the chronology here, as
mail delivery was behaving strangely during the last few days.

> Could you explain, perhaps?

What part would you like me to explain?