Re: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change command to interactive ... modes

[Stefan Kangas]

Dmitry Gutov <dgutov@yandex.ru> writes:

> On 17.02.2021 00:00, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
>> And again, I don't see what makes extending `interactive' so special
>> here.  We introduce new things in Emacs Lisp all the time when we think
>> that that improves the language.
>
> You're extending it in an incompatible way, one that most third-party
> code won't be able to make use of for years to come.

I don't think the second half of this sentence is correct.  Please see
my compatibility macro `future-interactive' posted to this list.