[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Current mode command discovery
From: |
Matt Armstrong |
Subject: |
Re: Current mode command discovery |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Feb 2021 14:28:41 -0800 |
Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> writes:
> Matt Armstrong <matt@rfc20.org> writes:
>
>> I say "signal" because I'm not sure what you're imagining: a
>> exploration/discoverability tool or a menu of stuff absolutely known to
>> work here commands.
>
> My hope is that `M-x' will eventually be more like the latter, while
> `M-X' will be more like "immediately relevant to this mode".
Yes, I like that idea.
- Re: Current mode command discovery, (continued)
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/19
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Matt Armstrong, 2021/02/17
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/17
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Matt Armstrong, 2021/02/17
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/17
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Stefan Kangas, 2021/02/17
- Re: Current mode command discovery,
Matt Armstrong <=
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Jean Louis, 2021/02/20
Re: Current mode command discovery, Jean Louis, 2021/02/20
Re: Current mode command discovery, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/20
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/20
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/20
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/20
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2021/02/20
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/20
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2021/02/20
- Re: Current mode command discovery, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/20