[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [External] : Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: [External] : Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...] |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:30:59 +0000 |
Hello, Lars.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 12:33:45 +0100, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> > What happens when a command that was only relevant to a single mode is
> > extended to become more widely used? Wouldn't we need to remove the
> > tagging? And if we do need to do it, how will we manage not to forget
> > updating the tagging?
> The tagging is right there in the `interactive' spec (and not somewhere
> else (in a plist, for instance)), which is one of the reasons that I
> want the syntax to be easy and clear -- it makes it much less likely
> that somebody will forget to change the tagging in cases like this.
> (But I don't think that we will, in practice, see all that much of this.
> Nobody is going to suddenly use commands from 5x5.el in dired.el.)
What about commands used by a small number of modes, but that set of
modes is only known at runtime?
Are we supposed to amend a command's interactive spec at runtime?
> --
> (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
> bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
- Re: [External] : Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...], (continued)
- Re: [External] : Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...], Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/18
- Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...], Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/18
- Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...], Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/20
- Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...], Stefan Monnier, 2021/02/20
- Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...], Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/20
- Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...], Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/20
- Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...], Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/21
- Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...], Dmitry Gutov, 2021/02/21
- Re: [External] : Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...], Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/02/19
- Re: [External] : Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...], Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/19
- Re: [External] : Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...],
Alan Mackenzie <=
- Re: [External] : Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...], Óscar Fuentes, 2021/02/18
- Re: [External] : Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...], Alan Mackenzie, 2021/02/18
- Re: [External] : Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...], Óscar Fuentes, 2021/02/18
- Re: [External] : Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...], Alan Mackenzie, 2021/02/18
- Re: [External] : Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...], Robert Pluim, 2021/02/18
- Re: [External] : Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...], Yuan Fu, 2021/02/18
- Re: [External] : Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...], Robert Pluim, 2021/02/19
- Re: [External] : Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...], Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/19
- Re: [External] : Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...], Robert Pluim, 2021/02/19
- Re: [External] : Re: command mode-specificity [was: scratch/command 064f146 1/2: Change...], Eli Zaretskii, 2021/02/19