Re: Sorting command completions by recency

[Juri Linkov]

>> Maybe it would make sense to have a general option to configure this history
>> sorting. When the table doesn't specify its own sorting one could opt in to
>> always sort base on history.
>
> Agreed.
> It'd make sense to have it as a global option, like
> `completion-cycle-threshold` and it would also make sense to be able to
> override it individually via `completion-category-overrides` (which is
> also the case for the cycling behavior).

Todo in minibuffer.el:

  ;; - for M-x, cycle-sort commands that have no key binding first.

So there are at least 3 possible sort orders:

- alphabetical
- no key binding first
- history sorting

Then the question is how the users could select a sort order.
Maybe either by customization or using a keybinding.