Re: A different way to interactively pass options to commands

[Stefan Monnier]

>   > (defun copy-next-command-output ()
>   >   "Prefix command to add the output of the next command to the 
> `kill-ring`."
>
> It looks useful, but wouldn't copy-previous-command-output be better?
> With that, you could make the decision after running the other command
> and seeing its output.

Of course, but while it's easy to predict the future, it can be
hard to find what happened after the fact ;-)


        Stefan