[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bugfix for utf-8 XTerm/MinTTY and (set-input-meta-mode t)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Bugfix for utf-8 XTerm/MinTTY and (set-input-meta-mode t) |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Jun 2021 19:51:28 +0300 |
> Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2021 16:19:40 +0000
> From: Max Mikhanosha <max.mikhanosha@protonmail.com>
>
> Both XTerm and MinTTY, when configured to send meta modifier as 8th bit while
> in utf-8 mode, will first add 8th bit, and then encode resulting character
> with utf-8. For example Meta-X is encoded as ?x+120 = #248 codepoint, encoded
> as 0xc3,0xb8
If these terminal emulators send M-x as 248 decimal, then how do they
send the Latin character ΓΈ, whose codepoint is 248 decimal?
- Bugfix for utf-8 XTerm/MinTTY and (set-input-meta-mode t), Max Mikhanosha, 2021/06/01
- Re: Bugfix for utf-8 XTerm/MinTTY and (set-input-meta-mode t),
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Bugfix for utf-8 XTerm/MinTTY and (set-input-meta-mode t), Max Mikhanosha, 2021/06/01
- Re: Bugfix for utf-8 XTerm/MinTTY and (set-input-meta-mode t), Eli Zaretskii, 2021/06/01
- Re: Bugfix for utf-8 XTerm/MinTTY and (set-input-meta-mode t), Max Mikhanosha, 2021/06/01
- Re: Bugfix for utf-8 XTerm/MinTTY and (set-input-meta-mode t), Eli Zaretskii, 2021/06/01
- Re: Bugfix for utf-8 XTerm/MinTTY and (set-input-meta-mode t), Max Mikhanosha, 2021/06/01
- Re: Bugfix for utf-8 XTerm/MinTTY and (set-input-meta-mode t), Eli Zaretskii, 2021/06/01