Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter

[Manuel Giraud]

Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org> writes:

[...]

> The tree-sitter runtime, that Emacs would link with, it implemented in
> C, partly for this reason. It would be compiled with whatever Emacs is
> compiled with, or the system compiler.
>
> Some of the tree-sitter development tools are implemented in Rust; you
> only need Rust if you are developing/fixing a grammar for a language.

Hi,

I too did not follow the tree-sitter discussion closely. But AFAIU,
tree-sitter provides tools to generate a parser (in C) from a grammar.

So, is it the generated parsers (for any language Emacs supports) that
will be versionned into the emacs tree?
-- 
Manuel Giraud