[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitte
From: |
Daniele Nicolodi |
Subject: |
Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Jul 2021 16:51:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.12.0 |
On 28/07/2021 16:24, Dmitry Gutov wrote:
> On 28.07.2021 16:27, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> The whole point of using TS is NOT to require that
>> the Emacs development team or Emacs users should know enough about
>> parsing of the many languages Emacs supports to modify the grammar.
>> We want another, independent development team to take care of that,
>
> I think we know both, though? There are a number of niche languages that
> only Emacs supports.
>
> Or at least that aren't likely to get good support in TreeSitter.
I don't see how adding support for TreeSitter can cause any problem to
those. Would you like to elaborate? No one is proposing to disable other
mechanism for fontification and syntax analysis in Emacs.
Cheers,
Dan
- Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/07/27
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Stephen Leake, 2021/07/27
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Manuel Giraud, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter,
Daniele Nicolodi <=
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Perry E. Metzger, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/07/28
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Stephen Leake, 2021/07/29
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Yuan Fu, 2021/07/29
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Stephen Leake, 2021/07/30
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Andrei Kuznetsov, 2021/07/29
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Arthur Miller, 2021/07/30
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Óscar Fuentes, 2021/07/30
- Re: [SPAM UNSURE] Maybe we're taking a wrong approach towards tree-sitter, Arthur Miller, 2021/07/30