[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [External] : Re: Dired C idea
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: [External] : Re: Dired C idea |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Aug 2021 14:31:21 +0000 |
> > As an ignoramus in this area, this reaffirms my guess
> > that we should offer both, and `C' in Dired should be
> > kept for ordinary copy, with possibly a new Dired key
> > being given to rsync.
>
> Or may be that we provide just a new function, similar to the case of
> (list-buffers). Now people have a choice to re-bind ‘C-x C-b’ to
> (ibuffer) family of functions.
Yes, that would be my (ignorant) preference, as
I think I mentioned in the beginning. But _if_
it's decided to give the new command a key binding
right away, I'm suggesting that it not take over
`C' from `dired-do-copy' as a default binding.
- Re: Dired C idea, Michael Albinus, 2021/08/01
- Re: Dired C idea, Richard Stallman, 2021/08/01
- Re: Dired C idea, Arthur Miller, 2021/08/03
- Re: Dired C idea, Gregory Heytings, 2021/08/03
- Re: Dired C idea, Stefan Monnier, 2021/08/03
- Re: Dired C idea, Andreas Schwab, 2021/08/04
- Re: Dired C idea, Arthur Miller, 2021/08/04
- Re: Dired C idea, Fabrice Bauzac-Stehly, 2021/08/03
- Re: Dired C idea, Eric Abrahamsen, 2021/08/03
- Re: Dired C idea, Arthur Miller, 2021/08/04
- Re: Dired C idea, Richard Stallman, 2021/08/05