Re: oauth2 support for Emacs email clients

[Richard Stallman]

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > >> Someone might agree to take the legal risk to violate these TOS. 
  > >> IANAL, but I observe that no other "small" free software project (e.g. 
  > >> Mutt or Alpine) took that risk.  Two larger free software projects 
  > >> (Thunderbird and Kmail) took that risk, but their apps were registered 
  > >> by a legal person, not by a developer.
  > >
  > > There you have something, isn't FSF a legal person? Is GNU an 
  > > organisation right?

Can someoe point me at the _precise_ agreement text for this?
Then the FSF could actually study the question.

Part of what we would have to think about is whether agreeing would
enable us to fix the problem by including these tokens in the Emacs release.
If we didn't include them, the agreement would (as far as I can see)
do no good.

(BTW, I think every human being is a "legal person" too.)

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)