[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why not set Emacs development workflow based on the popular git forg
From: |
Ben Mezger |
Subject: |
Re: Why not set Emacs development workflow based on the popular git forges (GitHub, Bitbucket, Gitlab, ect)? |
Date: |
Sat, 04 Sep 2021 11:04:42 -0300 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.6.4; emacs 28.0.50 |
I don't think a follow-up in this thread is necessary, as there is a
huge thread already in place concerning this discussion, but:
> OTOH, Linux kernel [1] has already adopted GitHub as its development
> platform, which is also complete free and a classic example of
> successful free software.
Not really, no. The Linux's Github repo is only a mirror of the
repository, however, no PR, discussion happen there, and those that do
happen, are ignored.
Hongyi Zhao <hongyi.zhao@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Sep 4, 2021 at 7:24 PM Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Nowadays, the large software projects often conduct the development on
>> > the workflow supplied by git forges (GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab,
>> > etc.). But it seems that Emacs is still developed directly on git, as
>> > described here [1], which makes maintaining GNU Emacs development a
>> > lot of extra work.
>>
>> GitHub, Bitbucket and GitLab require their users to run non-free
>> software, which already disqualifies them for the development of GNU
>> software.
>
> If so, I don't think there is such a complete free platform in the
> world, even the SourceHut you mentioned below, which is also operated,
> at least in part, as a commercial product. OTOH, Linux kernel [1] has
> already adopted GitHub as its development platform, which is also
> complete free and a classic example of successful free software.
>
>> There was recently a discussion (perhaps it is still in progress? I
>> don't know) about moving to SourceHut, but I don't think it's gone
>> anywhere. The problem seems to be that the present system exists and
>> works, while nobody has sat down and completed the work required to
>> migrate to a new one.
>
> I can't say anything. Almost all Emacs developers and users are
> excellent programmers/scientists/engineers. But excellent people also
> have their own beliefs, quirks and their inner bottom line. Sometimes
> it may not be consistent with the prevailing trend, just like the
> existence of Emacs itself.
>
>> Would you like to volunteer? :D
>
> Technically speaking, I think there are so many guys in Emacs
> community have enough ability to do this.
>
> [1] https://github.com/torvalds/linux
>
> Best, Hongyi
--
Kind regards,
Met een vriendelijke groet,
Atenciosamente,
Ben Mezger
https://seds.nl
https://github.com/benmezger
- Re: Why not set Emacs development workflow based on the popular git forges (GitHub, Bitbucket, Gitlab, ect)?, (continued)
- Re: Why not set Emacs development workflow based on the popular git forges (GitHub, Bitbucket, Gitlab, ect)?, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/09/04
- Re: Why not set Emacs development workflow based on the popular git forges (GitHub, Bitbucket, Gitlab, ect)?, Max Nikulin, 2021/09/07
- Re: Why not set Emacs development workflow based on the popular git forges (GitHub, Bitbucket, Gitlab, ect)?, Po Lu, 2021/09/07
- Re: Why not set Emacs development workflow based on the popular git forges (GitHub, Bitbucket, Gitlab, ect)?, Max Nikulin, 2021/09/08
- Re: Why not set Emacs development workflow based on the popular git forges (GitHub, Bitbucket, Gitlab, ect)?, Tim Cross, 2021/09/08
- Re: Why not set Emacs development workflow based on the popular git forges (GitHub, Bitbucket, Gitlab, ect)?, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/09/09
- Re: Why not set Emacs development workflow based on the popular git forges (GitHub, Bitbucket, Gitlab, ect)?, Richard Stallman, 2021/09/09
- Re: Why not set Emacs development workflow based on the popular git forges (GitHub, Bitbucket, Gitlab, ect)?, Max Nikulin, 2021/09/16
- Re: Why not set Emacs development workflow based on the popular git forges (GitHub, Bitbucket, Gitlab, ect)?, chad, 2021/09/16
- Re: Why not set Emacs development workflow based on the popular git forges (GitHub, Bitbucket, Gitlab, ect)?, Dmitry Gutov, 2021/09/08
- Re: Why not set Emacs development workflow based on the popular git forges (GitHub, Bitbucket, Gitlab, ect)?,
Ben Mezger <=