Re: Representation of the Emacs userbase on emacs-devel

[Richard Stallman]

[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]

  > > I just don't think discussion should be in terms of "sane", "better" or 
other
  > > value-loaded terms. "Different" is probably the most helpful term we can 
use
  > > here.

  > I wold agree with this sentiment. Another term could be 'alternative'.
  > Using terms like 'sane' or 'better' is likely to add more 'noise' rather
  > than useful discussion as it can tend to make people feel like they need
  > to defend their particular preferences as being 'sane' or 'better'. 

I agree.  We can be kinder in this discussion if we avoid implying
that a preference for some different key bindings or interface
is a sign of a personal failing.

-- 
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)