|
From: | Phil Sainty |
Subject: | Re: master ff4de1b: Fix quoting style in Lisp comments |
Date: | Sat, 18 Sep 2021 00:38:50 +1200 |
User-agent: | Orcon Webmail |
On 2021-09-18 00:09, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
I don't see anybody concur with your stance in this particular discussion, and if you search the old one, I think it was mostly Paul (?), and even he was really arguing toward something different, in a different context as well (plain text files).It doesn't matter. This is a decision we already made, so just saying you don't like it is not good enough. We need a much stronger reason to reverse previous decisions.
I might have missed something, but I think almost everyone else in this thread has expressed some degree of surprise/confusion that elisp comments would be categorised as "plain text" and/or the notion that the previous decision was ever intended to apply to those. If the only strong reason for making a change here is to adhere to a decision that nobody (or almost nobody) was *actually* trying to make (where elisp comments are concerned), then that would seem like a very strong reason to stop and reassess. I don't know the answer, but I'm seeing a lot of confusion. Can we at minimum get confirmation from the people who were arguing for fancy quotes in those old discussions that they wanted *this* as well? Because if those people weren't trying to change elisp comments, then I don't think the old decision is relevant here, in which case nothing would be "reversed" by maintaining the traditional quoting style. -Phil
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |