[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal: Forwards-Compatibility Library for Emacs
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal: Forwards-Compatibility Library for Emacs |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Sep 2021 13:29:32 +0000 |
João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
>>> I think this uncleanliness is a bit risky. Better put the definitions
>>> in their own namespace. I don't think "transparent compatibility" is
>>> worth the trouble here, and I don't think `s`, `f`, ... solve the
>>> same problem.
>>
>> Can symbol-renaming help here, perhaps? I believe João is trying to
>> get it ready in time for Emacs 28.
>
> Confirmed. I am working on the documentation and hope to provide
> "hygienic", drop-in versions of those very `s.el`, `f.el` libraries. I
> agree with Stefan that those libraries don't seem to be solving the same
> problem of forward-compatibility, though (at least how I've understood
> it, which may very well be "not at all").
Where can I find the code/examples on how this would look like?
> João
--
Philip Kaludercic
Re: Proposal: Forwards-Compatibility Library for Emacs, Philip Kaludercic, 2021/09/21
Re: Proposal: Forwards-Compatibility Library for Emacs, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/09/21