Re: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols

[João Távora]

On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 9:12 PM Stefan Kangas <stefankangas@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >>  Otherwise, we are probably better off just leaving things as they are,
> >> rather than complicating things just for the sake of it.
> >
> > Yes, "for the sake of it" is obviously bad.  But solving particular
> > problems that are well described is fine with me.
>
> I guess I'm trying to say that it would also be fine to wait until we
> have more experience with this.

Yeah, that is exactly what I wish will happen.  For people to try
it and to detect where it solves their problems and where it doesn't.
Not to mention say where it has _created_ problems (i.e. where
it might have introduced bugs).

João