Re: Better way to require with shorthands/renamed symbols

[T.V Raman]

This is a suggestion for thinking about *after* we have had some
experience using this:

Consider a prefix separator char like ':' so that the shorthand is
easily distinguishable as a shorthand prefix? Might help in many ways:

1. Indicates to the reader that new: is a shorthand prefix.
   2. Enable refactoring/renaming code to easily change the prefix or
      undo it if desired 
-- 

Thanks,

--Raman(I Search, I Find, I Misplace, I Research)
?7?4 Id: kg:/m/0285kf1  ?0?8