|
From: | Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: | Re: [External] : Re: Do shorthands break basic tooling (tags, grep, etc)? (was Re: Shorthands have landed on master) |
Date: | Fri, 01 Oct 2021 00:10:43 +0200 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes: > > Tools that understand the symbolic nature of the Lisp > > family of languages. For the example you have since, > > Tools that rely on way or the other really on the > > 'read' Lisp primitive. > > https://github.com/emacsmirror/el-search Yes, thanks Drew. Indeed I was wondering whether shorthands would break el-search, but it was trivial to add support for them because el-search is (solely) based on `read'ing. Therefore it's slower than grepping of course, but it's still acceptable (~ 10 seconds for the entire Emacs Lisp code base) > (Not sure that's the latest or best or only location. > Ccing Michael H.) Latest and best location is on my HDD, sadly, I did not update for quite a while (actually since the change of the infrastructure of the Gnu Elpa repo). If anyone is interested I can post a newer version. Michael.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |