[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Our use of the "fixed" tag in debbugs
|
From: |
Glenn Morris |
|
Subject: |
Re: Our use of the "fixed" tag in debbugs |
|
Date: |
Fri, 08 Oct 2021 11:41:18 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) |
"Basil L. Contovounesios" wrote:
> Eli Zaretskii [2021-10-08 14:21 +0300] wrote:
>
>> Btw, "close NNN XX.YY" doesn't mark the bug as "done", see
Yes it does.
> But I feel like I've run into a "closed but not done" issue once before,
> so maybe there's a bug under certain conditions.
I don't know what "closed but not done" really means, but this sounds
like either:
"forgot to (b)cc the control server" (so not closed at all)
or
"closed by forcemerge with an already closed bug" (so closed but no
new "done" message gets sent out)
- Re: Our use of the "fixed" tag in debbugs, (continued)
- Re: Our use of the "fixed" tag in debbugs, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2021/10/05
- Re: Our use of the "fixed" tag in debbugs, Glenn Morris, 2021/10/05
- Re: Our use of the "fixed" tag in debbugs, Basil L. Contovounesios, 2021/10/05
- Re: Our use of the "fixed" tag in debbugs, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/05
- Re: Our use of the "fixed" tag in debbugs, Eli Zaretskii, 2021/10/08